A slightly different Friends policy
Jul. 17th, 2006 02:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Due to recent events in which it became somewhat clear that a person on my friends list either sent a synopsis of my friends-only posts or the text of the posts themselves to a third party who had no business seeing them, I have trimmed the list of people who have friends priviledges.
The list of people who currently are on the friends list are people I have either met in person or have developed a relationship with online. Please do not be offended if you aren't on this list, and feel free to unfriend me if you chose, I won't be offended. Really, I won't.
I will still post my research on this LJ in public posts, if you want to keep track of it and not have me as a friend, Bloglines is a great way to do it.
I have also changed the comment policy so that if you aren't on my friends list, the comment is screened until I unscreen it. This is in case of an unplesant occurance, which hasn't occurred, but it seemed a better way to handle comments that restricting them to friends only. I know that people enjoy the research posts and like to comment on them and I wanted to give people who weren't on my friends list the chance to do that, while limiting the impact of those with malicious intent.
I wish that I hadn't had to do this, but it was probably bound to happen sooner or later.
The list of people who currently are on the friends list are people I have either met in person or have developed a relationship with online. Please do not be offended if you aren't on this list, and feel free to unfriend me if you chose, I won't be offended. Really, I won't.
I will still post my research on this LJ in public posts, if you want to keep track of it and not have me as a friend, Bloglines is a great way to do it.
I have also changed the comment policy so that if you aren't on my friends list, the comment is screened until I unscreen it. This is in case of an unplesant occurance, which hasn't occurred, but it seemed a better way to handle comments that restricting them to friends only. I know that people enjoy the research posts and like to comment on them and I wanted to give people who weren't on my friends list the chance to do that, while limiting the impact of those with malicious intent.
I wish that I hadn't had to do this, but it was probably bound to happen sooner or later.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 06:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:26 pm (UTC)Have you considered a filter group? That might help you out some.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:30 pm (UTC)So for today its a trimming of the friends list and comtemplating what filters I'd actually use and catagories that people would fall into.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:34 pm (UTC)I'm truly sorry you were betrayed by a 'friend.' Here's to feeling better soon.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 06:41 pm (UTC)Do you know for sure now that it was somebody on your f-list that leaked, and not some other way?
:-(
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:00 pm (UTC)I know how betrayed a person can feel about that sort of thing as I've not only had it happen to me but to others as well. I understand why you've chosen to be more private.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:15 pm (UTC)Hang in there, and don't let this get you down - there are definately more important things in life. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 07:58 pm (UTC)B. Thank you for keeping me. Your work is fascinating and impressive. I always learn something from your posts and I am always pleased to hear about your triumps.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 08:23 pm (UTC)Eva
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 08:42 pm (UTC)ewww
Date: 2006-07-19 10:45 am (UTC)I guess my rule of thumb is if I wouldn't say it out loud to anyone then I won't type it online. And you've probably learned that one as well if you lost your job that way.
Re: ewww
Date: 2006-07-19 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 10:59 pm (UTC)*hugs*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-17 11:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-18 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-18 02:34 am (UTC)Thanks for keeping the research public anyhow. Good luck for this all working out.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-18 07:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-18 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-18 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-19 10:50 am (UTC)I hope I can be reconsidered for your friends list when the time comes... in the mean time good luck and healthy baby thoughts.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-19 01:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-20 07:01 am (UTC)Best wishes,
Peronel
*Hope this is sufficiently vague - delete if it reveals more in public than you want.